Saturday, March 28, 2015

The Internet is officially over

This showed up in my inbox this morning, reminding me that given enough time, civilization infests any good thing and turns it into the usual human behavior: rent-seeking, victim narrative, material over ideal type thinking:

Do you have any Facebook page,Twitter/Instagram profile or YouTube video? Do you want to get more likes/fans,followers or views. we can promote and increase Facebook page likes,twitter/Instagram followers,likes and YouTube views affoardably and fast.


1) 5,000 Facebook Fans/Likes    = Order at:-
2) 5,000 Twitter followers      = Order at:-
3) 1,000 Google+ Ones           = Order at:-
4) 5,000 Instagram Followers    = Order at:-
5) 50,000 YouTube views         = Order at:-

You can also order smaller or bigger package from our official website.

Similar offers have been seen for Digg, Reddit and Tumblr on other services.

It's all fake: when the news shows you what "the internet" is doing, they are showing you what is bought and paid for just like their own advertising.

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Texians Under Attack

At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Republic of Texas, officially starting at 9:50 a.m. and held, as usual, at the rented VFW Post 4892 in Bryan, Texas, the congenial and unimposing group was raided at 10:10 a.m. by an army of policing agencies with flashing emergency lights:  Police Departments of Bryan and College Station along with their Brazos County Sheriff's Office counterparts (northeast of San Antonio) along with deputies from the Kerr County Sheriff's Office (west of San Antonio), The Texas Rangers, Department of Public Safety Highway Patrol State Troopers, The Texas State Attorney General’s Office, the FBI, and the US Marshall Service.  Ingress and egress from Harvey Mitchell Parkway was sealed even to the media that responded two hours later from KBTX television during the four-hour ordeal.

How is it that a supposedly free people can be subjected to intimidating, rough and highly intrusive search and seizure when assembling lawfully and peaceably from all corners of this vast Country of Texas to educate those in attendance about the Historical 1836 Republic of Texas Constitution and celebrate a Nation wide Valentine's Day and a fellow Texian's 89th birthday?

The lead Kerr County deputy named in the paperwork, Jeff McCoy, who initially pretended to be a guest from Houston at the freely open-to-the-public meeting, stood up and blocked the only exit to the Republic of Texas' rented room with armed and threatening police, announcing that he had a search warrant but he would not present it despite repeated requests stating that it would be made available AFTER the investigation. Everyone present was put on notice that they were not to leave the room without permission and escort by uniformed officers, almost all armed and wearing bulletproof vests. Some 15 to 30 minutes later a fleeting copy of the search warrant surfaced unannounced on the main table of which was never officially presented to those detained and searched.

As if dangerous criminals, many of the Texian people - generally seniors of respected middle-class business, farming, broadcasting, engineering, scientific, health, veterans and faith-based backgrounds - were one-by-one physically searched on their person and in their vehicles, finger printed, detained and then had their personal belongings and property searched and seized. Surprisingly, the warranted DNA swabbing was omitted.  

A receipt (not well detailed or itemized) was issued to only SOME whose property was seized.  Therefore most all seizures that day are considered LEGAL THEFT. Among the items stolen were cell phones, iPads, laptops, business papers, Republic of Texas paperwork and coinage of precious metals along with other valuables. Some of the phones were essential to their owners in conducting business and schoolwork, safely traveling the highways and attending to emergency medical calls as health professionals.  One of the senior Texians often featured in documentaries and alternative radio and known to suffer with health concerns had to be taken by emergency vehicle to a hospital as a result of the forced takeover of the peaceful assembly.

The team of investigators left with the trunk and backseat of an unmarked sedan apparently belonging to Deputy Jeff McCoy, fully packed with confiscated belongings without a copy of the Search Warrant provided to anyone associated with the Republic of Texas. Instead, the warrant was given to the Post Commander of the VFW facility who was instructed not to copy the document nor divulge its contents to anyone. 

The fortuitously warrant revealed it was issued by 216th District Court Judge N. Keith Williams of Kerr County alleging an unauthorized summons had been issued by the Republic of Texas. The documents alleged to be unauthorized were a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Quo Warranto issued by “The Officers and Constituents of The International Common Law Court for the Republic of Texas to Melvin Rex Emerson Jr., Court Administrator, and Color of Law ID No. 24009018, 700 Main Street, Kerrville, Texas. Kerr County” and was so stated on the document “This writ is hereby served by said Petitioner upon you, Melvin Rex Emerson Jr. as an individual”. In no way was the “State of Texas” intimated to be part or parcel to the documents.

If the Writ of Mandamus and the Quo Warranto issued for the Republic of Texas International Common Law Court were purely frivolous in nature, then why did this judge call out HIS MILITIA to address this action? What instilled such fear in him?  Why was it necessary to confiscate tens of thousands of dollars, Gold and Silver Metals being private and confidential property that was unrelated to the search warrant for a allegedly Class A Misdemeanor offense?  One Texian noted that one officer confided that he probably would NEVER see his property again. Just who is the guilty party here? Could it be that the people of the Republic of Texas are rightfully fully vested with the power of the paperwork served on Judge Everson?  Undoubtedly, additional paperwork needs to be issued!  You decide.

Contrary to patently false reports by KBTX that the Republic of Texas and its assemblage were a militia group, the truth is that the Republic of Texas is a self-determined people attempting to throw off the yoke of military occupation of Texas through peaceful and lawful process. The entire land boundaries of the United States are also under military occupation thanks to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.  If you don't believe it, you can read it for yourself: ( Select: History Tab; Select
“The Non-Ratification of the 14th Amendment – Highlighted by Robert Wilson”
Selection option).

John Harold Jarnecke
President of the republic of Texas
February 17, 2015
Contact: for the Secretary of State

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Republic of Texas Meeting Raided

How is it that a people, gathered lawfully and peaceably to learn about the constitution, celebrate Valentine’s Day and a friend's 89th birthday be subjected to search and seizure?

How can we be held against our will without due process?

And how can our personal belongings be seized without proper court proceedings?

The Republic of Texas is reported to be a "militia" group by the news media. The truth is that the republic of Texas is a self-determined people attempting to throw off the yoke of military occupation of Texas through a peaceful, lawful process. The entire land boundaries of the United States are also under military occupation thanks to the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States. Don't believe it? Read it for yourself here.

216th District Court Judge N. Keith Williams alleging the republic of Texas issued an unauthorized summons issued a Search Warrant. There was no summons issued to appear before the Common Law Court of the republic of Texas.

The news media stated the republic of Texas does not have legal authority to issue summons. That statement is only half true. If the summons was issued on State of Texas stationery or implied that it came from the State of Texas or one of its entities, then they are correct, but a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Quo Warranto was issued by the Common Law Court of the republic of Texas to 198th District Court Judge Melvin Rex Emerson Junior.

If the document was frivolous and of no import, then why did the judge call out HIS MILITIA to address this action? What is he afraid of? Why was it necessary to confiscate so much material that was unrelated to the search warrant? Will the owners of the property get it back? One man stated that he was told that he would not get his possessions back. All this for a Class A Misdemeanor? Could it be that We the People are vested with the power? You decide!

John Harold Jarnecke
President of the republic of Texas
February 17, 2015

Saturday, November 01, 2014

The left uses the word "fascist" for the NSDAP in order to stir up indignation

Leftists like to use the term "fascist" to refer to anyone farther right than a moderate, but if they could, they would shift the frame to include anyone who is not leftist.

They started by using the term "fascist" to refer to National Socialists, who were not fascists at all. Tom Wolfe explains:

This first American Writers' Congress was held in 1935 . It was an attempt by the Communist Party to remove the red glare in the coloring of their cultural movement--in the arts, movies, literature--and to focus on the anti-Nazi, anti-fascist cause.

In fact, it was the Communist Party that invented the word fascist to apply to the Nazis. The fascists were only in Italy, members of a socialist party known as the Fascisti. The word was never used in Germany. The Communists wanted to obscure the fact that the Nazis and the Fascisti were, like themselves, national socialists. The acronym NAZI stands for the National Socialist Workers Party. So, was Soviet communism national socialism? Absolutely. Communists the world over never did a thing that wasn't for the defense or the advance of the Soviet Union. -- Tom Wolfe, Interview 2006

Sunday, October 05, 2014

The term "racism" barely used until 1960s

How to end bullying: legalize retribution

A recent news item from the land of insanity and perfect tea caught my eye:

A court heard how after two girls called Walker Harry Potter, he snapped, stabbing one of them in the face so hard that the blade of his vegetable knife broke.

Walker then pushed the other girl's head into a nearby fence and shouted: ‘Die, die’.

He claimed he launched the ferocious attacks in Southampton, Hampshire, after being goaded repeatedly by the girls who called him Potter.

As far as anyone who is sane is concerned, this guy did nothing wrong. They bullied him and the school and authorities did nothing, thus he fixed the situation by injuring the injurers.

The authorities then swooped in and seized him and punished him, but this makes no sense. He was not acting on his own here; they began the assault with social mockery. This is damaging to individuals. He stopped the damage.

Even more, we should look at this on a social scale. All of our anti-bullying programs have failed. Not just a little, but utterly failed to achieve anything. We are incentivizing bullying by protecting bullies and persecuting those who defend themselves against them.

"Sticks and stones..." -- no. Social mockery is destructive and causes extreme emotional trauma. If we are serious about stopping bullying, legalize retribution. Bullies will know they are no longer protected and will think more carefully, and we won't need to call the Nanny State SWAT teams to punish the bullied in the name of equality.

How false elites are created

The problem with false elites -- those created by ideology not ability -- is that in addition to being wrong, they are quite literally insane. All that they do comprises internal signals designed to advance the individual in the system and has nothing to do with reality.

Witness leading moron Tom Frieden in action, as reported by Red Flag News:

Barring all incoming flights from Ebola-hit countries in West Africa might seem like the best way to prevent an outbreak of the virus in the United States, but doing so would actually hurt efforts to curb the outbreak in the long run, Tom Frieden, M.D., MPH, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said today (Oct. 2).

“If we take actions that seem like they may work, they may be the kind of solution to a complex problem that is quick, simple and wrong,” said Frieden in a press conference. “The approach of isolating a country is that it’s going to make it harder to get help into that country.”

The man obviously has mental problems. When asked how to protect people in country A, he starts talking about fear of discrimination against country B. He's not even on topic. But he is sending the correct signals, namely, he is acting as if his country is so wealthy and powerful that it does not need to concern itself with self-preservation.

That signal appeases the voters, who like to hear how everything's going just fine!, and also appeases his liberal ideological comrades, who love the idea of equality and know that this can only happen through wealth transfer, thus will always discriminate against the powerful -- the whiter, maler, smarter, wealthier, healthier -- in order to advance the less capable.

If you wonder how civilizations exterminate themselves... wonder no more. They turn their focus from outward to inward, and start flattering each other and in doing so, drift farther from reality so that when collapse comes, it's a great shock and "no one" has anticipated it.

Saturday, August 23, 2014

What is Conservatism?

When Mitt Romney last year described himself as “severely conservative,” he was perhaps marking the nadir in the decline of conservatism as a potent, coherent political philosophy. In common usage now “conservative” means little more than “very enthusiastically Republican.” Thus a “moderate” is a so-so Republican and a “liberal” is an enemy of the party.

That loss of meaning comes in large part from a change in circumstances that conservatives have been slow to acknowledge. After the Cold War the alignments that defined conservatism for generations are gone like smoke. The powerful philosophical foundations that lay beneath those assumptions have for the most part been pasted over by bumper stickers and weakened by angst.

Conservatism stands on pillars far deeper than Karl Marx or Adam Smith. If conservatives can rediscover those traditions and come to terms with an evolving world, they will have a vital role to play in building a post-Cold War order.

The roots of conservatism stretch back to ancient understandings of human nature expressed by Plato and the later philosophers of the Roman Republic. The American and French Revolutions inspired the first modern efforts to define conservatism in the English-speaking world, best articulated at the time by the British parliamentarian Edmund Burke. The philosophy was probably best defined for our time by Russell Kirk in the 1950’s.

Kirk helped found the National Review along with William F. Buckley. Through his influence on Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, Kirk’s version of conservatism became the pole star of right wing politics in the late 20th Century.

In his 1953 book, The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot, Kirk summarized conservatism in six central tenets:
1)   Belief in a transcendent order
2)   Respect for the complexity of human existence
3)   Civilized society requires orders and classes
4)   Freedom and property are closely linked
5)   Distrust of “sophisters, calculators, and economists” who would reconstruct society upon abstract designs
6)   Change is necessary, but it must proceed carefully, cautiously, and with an eye toward preserving core social institutions

Kirk believed that a natural order set in place by a transcendent power governs political life in much the same way that physics guides the stars. That natural order is imperfect and sometimes unfair, but it preserves us from the ravages of our animal instincts.

The more we try to distort natural inequalities or tear down traditional social roles with political or social schemes, the greater the risk of unleashing chaotic political forces that destroy freedom and property rights. That understanding, forged in the French Revolution, was reinforced with new vigor by the Russian experience.

This tradition of conservatism sees rights in a very different light from Liberals. Conservatives reject the notion of universal human rights. Rights in the Anglo-conservative philosophy are hereditary, rising from tradition and custom.

Rights are not merely personal; they are a bond that ties us to generations past and future. In this conception, rights are not merely what the state owes me, they are bonds that tie society together in a web of privileges and duties extending beyond my own lifetime.

Life, people, and societies, in this view, can be improved, but they cannot be perfected. Changes we pursue in order to improve the world will occasionally succeed, but the more boldly we tamper with the natural social order the greater the risk of unleashing horrors. Wise politics is always governed by an overriding respect for prudence, guided by the lessons of our ancestors. Conservatism places a greater emphasis on prudence than on progress.

Prior to the rise of Communism, conservatives had a very uneasy relationship to Capitalism. For Conservatives, a web of rights and duties governs moral behavior. Capitalism replaces those rights and duties with a profit ethic. It replaces values established by tradition or custom with values set by markets. Capitalism makes conservatives uneasy because it disrupts the natural order in ways far more powerful than any government.

Capitalism unleashes what Schumpeter described as “creative destruction.” Markets do not value social stability, organic change, traditional hierarchies, or religion. Capitalism unleashes permanent, accelerating cycles of socially disruptive change. Capitalism is not conservative.

To make matters worse, capitalism demands a central authority strong enough to provide needed infrastructure and manage the externalities that would otherwise blow free markets apart. Capitalism demands a governmental infrastructure that conservatives find threatening in order to perpetuate an economic system that destroys the traditional social order conservatives cherish.
In the 20th Century Conservatives found common cause with Capitalists in fighting to protect property rights against state ownership schemes. After the death of Communism, that very old tension between capitalism and conservatism is emerging with new force, but little coherence.

With the collapse of the their common Marxist enemy, conservatives and capitalists will find themselves increasingly at odds, creating strange tensions in the Republican Party. The confusing misalignment between conservatism and capitalism is best seen in the Neo-Confederate politics of the Tea Party, where the rhetorical affection for capitalism is offset by a confusing hostility to everything capitalism demands.

How do we enjoy the benefits of markets while preserving our finest traditions from the wrecking ball? How do we protect the weak, the old, the sick, the young – those who cannot produce market value, from a system incapable of granting them respect? By combining a respect for property rights with a passion for traditional order, conservatives could offer a vital guide through this dark forest.

Unfortunately, Conservatism is trapped in its own Cold War rhetoric, intellectually stunted and unable to reach deep to regain its footing on older foundations. Until conservatives shake loose from their increasingly embarrassing Communist ghost hunts and rediscover their roots, they will not be a factor in the wider efforts of our culture to build a more human Capitalism.

- "What is Conservatism?" by Chris Ladd, Houston Chronicle, September 26, 2013

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Republic of Texas 2014 Ballot

***2014 Voting Ballot*** 1st September 2014

(To be assigned by the Secretary of State's office official designee.)

Ballot No: ________

The republic of Texas





1. How to mark your Voting Ballot:

Mark an “X” on the line next to your candidate(s) choice for whom you are voting, ----OR---- Write in

your own name or a candidate’s name of your choice in the Write-In Section.

2. Write-in Candidates:

Write in the name of a candidate of your choice below the “Write-In Candidate” area. You may write

in your own name or a name of someone else, if you wish, for any position on the Ballot.

If you write in your name or someone else, YOU MUST attach to the Voting Ballot a Write-In

Candidate Information form. This form is located in the Election Tab of the website. A Ballot number

will be assigned by the National Election Judge or a designated official in the Secretary of State's


Please read the “Candidate Eligibility” document in the Election Tab of the website.

3. District Offices:

All eligible voters who are domiciled in the jurisdictional republic of Texas counties for the district

where they are domiciled may vote for the Senate Seat candidate and Judicial District Office Seat

candidate or you may write-in a candidate. Read above instructions for write-in candidates.

4. County Offices:

All eligible voters who are domiciled in that named county may vote for House Representative(s), or

county positions as listed or may write-in a candidate’s name or if more than one position is

required you may write in one candidate’s name for each position.


When you have completed your Ballot and Write-In Candidate form(s), if applicable, MAIL your

Voting Ballot plus your Write-In Candidate Information form(s) TO:

Billy D. Ford P. O. Box 280 Iola, Texas



Failure to follow these instructions could disqualify your vote.

Page 1 of 4

***2014 Voting Ballot*** 1st September 2014

Ballot No: ________

(To be assigned by the Secretary of State's office official designee.)

The republic of Texas






Clerk Of the District Court #1

Harris, Liberty, and Galveston, Counties

Write-In Candidate:



Harris County – House Representative

_____________ Mike Wells

Write-In Candidate:

Galveston County – House Representative Write-In Candidate:

Liberty County – House Representative Write-In Candidate:


Clerk of the Court: Write-In Candidate:

Sheriff: Write-In Candidate:


Chief Justice Judge: Write-In Candidate:

Clerk of the Court: Write-In Candidate:

Sheriff: Write-In Candidate:

Page 2 of 4

***2014 Voting Ballot*** 1st September 2014

(To be assigned by the Secretary of State's office official designee.)

Ballot No: ________

The republic of Texas





Chief Justice Judge: Write-In Candidate:

Clerk of the Court: Write-In Candidate:

Sheriff: Write-In Candidate:

Page 3 of 4

***2014 Voting Ballot*** 1st September 2014

(To be assigned by the Secretary of State's office official designee.)

Ballot No: ________

The republic of Texas






This form is to ensure elector eligibility information only and will NOT be filed with your Ballot.

Mail this form with your marked Voting Ballot to:

Billy D. Ford

P. O. Box 280

Iola, Texas


Full Name:___________________________________________

Physical Address:_____________________________________

City / County:________________________________________

Home Phone:_________________________________________

Cell Phone:__________________________________________

Age / Birth Year:______________________________________

Length of time domiciled in County (mos./years): __________



VOTER'S SIGNATURE:__________________________________________________

VOTER'S PRINTED NAME:_______________________________________________

DATE SIGNED:___________________________________________________