Monday, December 01, 2008

Obama Election Causes Surge in White Nationalism


At least four books and dictionaries have defined Stormfront as the Internet's first "hate" site dating back to 1995. Stormfront's site link on a Google search comes with this description: "Racialist discussion board for pro-White activists and anyone else interested in White survival."

Barack Obama's election has helped drive up Stormfront traffic to record levels, Don Black said.

Duke said the historic election has helped galvanize support for the causes he believes in: "Obama enables people to see more clearly. It makes it clear we're losing control of our country."

But Don Black said press reports of threats against Obama on the Stormfront forums have been exaggerated. He said he suspects one contributor, who hadn't posted in six years, was deliberately trying to stir up trouble for the site recently. He said he does not condone violence and wants a "peaceful revolution" that ends racial preferences for minorities and promotes the civil liberties of whites.

Palm Beach Post


Ugh. As detailed elsewhere, white nationalism promotes a kind of us-versus-the-Other that denies the basic problem, which is that pluralism doesn't work, and replaces it with a jihad against other participants in multiculturalism -- instead of stating the simple and obvious, which is that multiculturalism is a form of pluralism, which doesn't work, and is a historical sign of a civilization declining according to Plato's life cycle of civilizations.

It's not rocket science. The problem is African-Americans, Jews, Whites, or American Indians. It's the idea that radically different needs can coexist under one institutional law.

1 Comments:

At 5:29 PM , Blogger weston said...

As detailed elsewhere, white nationalism promotes a kind of us-versus-the-Other that denies the basic problem, which is that pluralism doesn't work

I've noticed that you enjoy wrestling with strawmen when it comes to "white nationalism". Just for the sake of argument, what's your ethnic background?

Seems like "us-versus-the-Other" is a rejection of pluralism, no? In order to junk the dominant, pluralist system, we'll need something to replace it. The natural replacement for multiculturalism is the notion that Whites should look out for White interests. That's not a "jihad", that's common sense.

Futhermore, you're factually incorrect when you state that "white nationalists" don't attack pluralism. Jared Taylor, whom you've cited here, does it all of the time. Amren's focus on black crime is there to illustrate that multiculturalism doesn't work. The average person isn't as intelligent as you; appeals to Plato won't work. Black criminality is probably the simplest and most graphic way to poke holes in the dominant paradigm.

 

Post a Comment

Subvert the dominant paradigm, don't be a solipsist.

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home