Showing posts with label national socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national socialism. Show all posts

Sunday, December 08, 2013

Leftists secretly want to be dominated by fascists

Do leftists secretly want to get topped by fascist and archaic conservative elements? Check out this fascist-worship from lefty rag Salon:

As is not uncommon for black metal, the Ukrainian band Drudkh’s political commitments are unsavory while their music is surprisingly indie-art, and even world-music friendly. “Glare of Autumn,” from their 2004 “Autumn Aurora,” opens with an acoustic folk intro before launching into a complex layered drone, somewhere between Sonic Youth and Sigur Ros if either of those bands dabbled in traditional melodies. All Drudkh albums are worth checking out, including their all-acoustic effort, “Songs of Grief and Solitude.” - "10 metal tracks even non-metal-heads will love," by Noah Berlatsky, Salon, December 7, 2013.

It's great to see public acknowledgement that black metal is right-wing in its roots and persistent attitude. It's also good to see someone being truly "open-minded." But it's also a bit creepy.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Why the future of nationalism is far from the mess that is "White Nationalism"

As a traditionalist conservative, I recognize many modern doctrines under their ancient and more representative forms.
Thus for me, racism is a dead letter, but nationalism -- ethno-cultural self-rule for every ethnic and religious group on earth -- is one essential tenet of any happy society. Relative homogeneity allows evolution, where diversity is devolution through averaging.
At this point however, we need to ask ourselves whether we as a people want to survive. This applies to all European ethnic groups, moreso than those in the third world, as they are not experiencing mass immigration seeking wealth built over centuries.
Most Caucasian people want to self-destruct because first-world society is insufferable. It is ugly, tedious, based on obedience and power games, cruel and worst of all, pointless. We work too much, and wait in too many lines, for this illusion of tolerance and equality. Nonsense ideological doctrines like those are epitaphs of formerly great empires.
If we decide to survive, we must find some way of approaching The National Question. My advice is that we avoid being indirect, and simply state what we want: we want to live among our own and rule ourselves by culture, not Nanny State soft totalitarian government.
Among the indirect approaches are two that have been historically proven not to work. The first is the mainstream Republican method of never speaking of the problem, and the second is the underground far-right method of becoming Hollywood Nazis in an attempt to "wake up the sheeple."
The former approach never states an actual plan, and the latter states a plan that confuses appearance with actual need, and thus ends up being a horrible re-enactment of the worst of the WWI-WWII era as acted out by the stereotypes of Western Media.
I'm not the only one to see this. As The White Voice writes:
We at The White Voice are merely normal White people who see modern racial issues for what they are and commentate on how they affect our community. We believe in establishing a White collective through which Whites can operate and mobilize for their best interests. Ultimately our goal is a White homeland but done so the right way.
We are certainly not a part of whatever the "White power" or "White nationalist" movements are. These freaks who march around carrying Swastika flags while goose stepping doing Roman salutes do not represent our interests and are doing their part in scaring people away from White identitarianism.
...
Far too many people say that unless you are taking a "hardcore," screaming in people's face approach, you are wasting your time. No, it is you who is wasting your time trying to bait us into making asses of ourselves. The enemies of Western civilization enjoy your silliness but are afraid of those of us who are normal and reflect the way many Whites feel.
This is written in the context of an article about Craig Cobb, but knowing almost nothing about that situation and having seen thoughtful work by Mr. Cobb in the past, I have left that portion out of this analysis. It's more important we focus on the bigger picture: the future of nationalist politics.
To my mind, it's a mistake to identify as pro-white or neo-Nazi when what we want is much simpler. We want a nationalist world order. That means that each nation rules itself, makes its own rules, and does so through culture instead of the bureaucratic governments that absorb infinite money, make crazy rules, become corrupt, and kick down your door in the night because you said something socially unpopular on Farcebook or Twitless.
In my view, those who want to be "pro-white" should shift to this generalized nationalist program, and then realize that the left will never support them because nationalism conflicts with the leftist need for radical individualism.
To a leftist, if national borders or rules would cause them personal inconvenience, they must go, regardless of consequences. They will never support nationalism, culture, majoritarian or identitarian politics; instead, they will always oppose those.
This leaves us with the right, since there are only two generalized political directions: reality-referential (conservative) or socially-referential (leftist, liberal, socialist, communist, progressive, anarchist, etc.). If you trust reality and your own soul more than social groups, you're a latent conservative.
Conservatism has an answer to The National Question, which is to allow freedom of association and to un-do the liberal legislation enforcing diversity -- multiculturalism, internationalism, tolerance and cosmopolitanism are synonyms for this -- on a population that wants to be nice, but at some level doesn't want to obliterate itself.
Hollywood Nazis make us feel shame, guilt and pity. Responsible conservatives do not. It's time to put away the costumes and accessories, shelve the fetishes and conceits, and instead look at the practical task ahead of us, which is rebuilding our nations after centuries of neglect and abuse.

Saturday, February 02, 2013

Why the far right will never get anywhere

It's a circular firing squad:

From Reddit.

They're too busy upholding an image, and being individually "important," to unite and achieve anything.

If I were a hostile government agency, I'd want to make sure that any pro-white person felt that they had only two options:

  1. Be a jew-hating, negro-hating, violent, alienated, impoverished, prison-bound Nazi;
  2. Or, not.

The point is that all of those things in the first category are inextricably linked. In the anti-rightist view, you can't be a rightist without being a social dropout.

It's a very successful strategy, for those who oppose the right. As long a the right behaves this way, it will both drive away any popular support and consume itself from within.

It's not surprising the right has achieved nothing in the last 70 years.

The tragedy is that it's avoidable. As long as the doctrinaire extreme of the movement keep inducing good people like Occidentalist into being destructive, the real villains don't need to get their hands dirty and get to watch the right fail without a single touch.