Saturday, October 27, 2012

People who live in non-diverse environments are healthier

Alvarez’s study reviewed the health records of 2,367 Mexican-Americans and 2,790 African-Americans older than 65, and concluded they lived longer if they inhabited a community mostly populated by their group.

African-Americans “living in a county with an ethnic density of 50% or more … were 46% less likely to report doctor-diagnosed heart disease and 77% less likely to report cancer than those who lived in an ethnic density of less than 25%,” said a summary of the report, authored by Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. - Daily Caller

This comes as no surprise to anyone who read about Robert Putnam's diversity study.

Without diversity, we know the rules and we know what to do.

With diversity, everything is ambiguous, which seems cool at first, until we realize that then we are as likely to become targets as we are to become praised.

No wonder it's more stressful.

Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for "Bowling Alone," his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.

Diversity un-does civilization itself.

You no longer have a civilization; you have a job and a place to live, and some laws that you hope protect you.

But no one's on the same page. No one is going in the same direction. You are alone and isolated. And if someone else is offended, the crowd turns on you and tears you apart.

In the name of equality and the liberal ideal of "look ma, no borders" we have destroyed civic life, health, culture, values and our futures as nations or a civilization.

The West can reclaim the past by simply peeling away our diversity laws, cutting funding for diversity groups, and on a social level, rejecting the diversity narrative.

It's happening already but it needs to pick up the pace. It's time to shut down this out-of-control runaway government job creation program called "diversity."

It doesn't work. And now, it's killing people.

Doxing is how people suppress unpopular truths

What's an unpopular truth? (That's the title of this blog, renamed when I took over some years ago.)
An unpopular truth is an idea that is truthful, but also offensive to someone, usually a large group because groups tend to cluster together when challenged, instead of facing the disturbing information head-on.

It really depends on who the group is. Some truths are offensive to the majority in America and Europe, like that diversity doesn't work and we aren't all equal and most women would rather stay at home and be moms than have meaningless "careers."

Others are truths offensive to the minority.

For example, in the far-right underground, if you're pro-Israel (or even simply not anti-Israel), pro-American (or even simply not anti-American), or pro-African (or even simply not anti-African), you are a heretic and people want you destroyed.

How do they destroy?

They dox you, and then they depend on the leftist useful idiots out there to do their work for them: calling your work to complain, calling your landlord or neighbors to complain, calling your friends to complain, harassing your wife and kids until they divorce you.

It's the modern punishment: ostracism that also makes you bankrupt and alone.

Their goal is to stop you from talking. To shut you down.

The internet site Reddit recently lost all credibility when its admins helped dox one of its members who had helped make the site popular in the first place:
As some of you will be aware, one of Reddit's most active contributors, /u/Violentacrez deleted his account.

The short version of why he did this is; VA was doxxed in real life and Adrian Chen, of Gawker Media, was going to run an article on him.

The longer version is this. A few days ago, I asked VA to add me as a Mod on another one of his subs. He did so, but then replied that adding him as a moderator on r/creepshots 'may have sealed his fate' because Adrian Chen decided to 'hunt him down' and was going to print information about his real life in the article. I asked him how anyone could have his real information, as googling him doesn't bring up much. He is friends with a few people off Reddit. And he speculated that the Reddit Admins, /u/chromakode and /u/spez may have given it to Chen. - Reddit
ViolentAcrez was a good fellow because he behaved like a gentleman. He posted a lot of pornography, and that's not something I normally support. However, I tend to let it be. I'm more concerned about the real destruction of our environment, species and nationality than I am of some guy who is helping to wreck the porn industry by giving away their content for free.

ViolentAcrez may not have been ideal, but he is a real human being who deserves real privacy protection. If Reddit disagreed with what he was doing, they should have stopped taking the advertising money from it and banned him. That's an honest response. Instead they chose to get him fired and target his family.
Why resort to doxing? As one Redditor put it:
It's to enable people who hate someone to phone their place of work and anonymously tip them off about rape/paedophilia allegations, getting pizza ordered to their door at 2 in the morning, writing "DIE PAEDO BASTARD" on their front doors.
To phone their kids and threaten then physically. To phone in tips to the police about "Seeing someone just attack a kid, and then they went into house X on Y avenue."
Doxxing is for the anonymous to @%@#% up someone's life.
It's to enable real-world vigilantism by anonymous perpetrators, who - being anonymous - will get up to some nasty @^#$@#. - SarahC, Reddit
It's given rise to a typical leftist attack, which is to insert the false flag operative and then blame you for what they did:
A few months ago, I posted an article outing several far-right activists as informers who dox other far-righters for saying unpopular truths. In it, I revealed how Maury Knutson, Criostoir O'Domnallhain, and Sebastian Ernst Ronin have been trying to promote their own political "activism" by informing on other right-wing activists.

Shortly afterward, they misidentified Brett Stevens as the author of the post, and attempted to dox him by posting his real information on multiple posts that he made, while trying to entice left-wing activists to attack him. As in the past, they posted in open groups or where left-wingers are known to congregate. Their doxing attempt failed because they had the wrong information, and they didn't get a groundswell of opposition to Stevens.

This isn't the first time this little clique have done this. They tend to find people they can pick on, and attack them, then claim they're doing good work for the far-right. This is how they lure the unwary into their clique and maintain a claim to "relevance," which if you're impoverished and living on mental disability payments, seems like a good gig.

In other words, they proved the point and proved that they actually are informers. There's also a question of how they fund themselves, since all seem to receive money from the US government (and one admits it) that keeps them financially afloat.

Informers and informants are always with us. Their goal is to destroy the strong and logical among us, and replace those with agitprop-style crazies who discredit us. They attack anyone who speaks an unpopular truth, and use that social momentum to conceal their own activities, which generally consist in making reports to authorities about who is doing what in the far-right, and then trying to smash down anyone promising.
Beware these people as they'll be your friend today, but tomorrow, when they need some scene points or to make their LEO masters happy, they'll throw you under the bus and pretend they're heroes for ridding the "movement" of an unpopular person.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Leftists are in denial of natural selection

Indeed.

Do you believe in evolution? In natural selection?

The process is not over; humanity is not finished. It is never finished, but must keep growing or it stagnates.

What to do, then? Move forward, instead of past.

This means don't help the poor. Have help and care for those who suffer misfortune. But the poor will always be with us. Of their own making or lack of abilities.

Let nature -- the hand of God -- do her work.

Not just to the poor, but to the idle rich, and to the clueless, retarded, stupid, broken, misaligned, etc.

We got this way by purging the least necessary. The hunters kill the weak. The strong surge on, and all benefit.

Would you rather be born stupid and useless, or strong and intelligent? That is the question for future generations.

The White race is superior to the others, and found in Europe and America.

Superior to what? No -- superior for what; well, that's a tautology. Superior for its own purposes. Superior at being it. Superior at being what is necessary to evolve into the next level of what it is. As Nietzsche says, a bridge between humanity and what comes next. Why not? Inferior to what? No -- inferior for what...