Friday, November 09, 2007

Response shows school shooter was correct

Normal, functional members of society agree with the statements of Jokela shooter Pekka-Eric Auvinonen, although most condemn his actions. "People believe society is screwed up," said CORRUPT agitactivist Olli Herjata, "and they see how his words have been censored, and think that any society which cannot accept valid criticism from an invalid source will not last long."

When CORRUPT released statements supporting the shooter, they were among the first, and were misunderstood in that they offered no moralization on his actions, but pointed out repeatedly that his criticisms of society were valid. "We're not looking for Utopia," Herjata said. "We believe our current society is headed toward a slow doom of devolution, and we prefer a society that's rising, making beautiful things, and in which it's fun and not so utilitarian to live. Utilitarianism, capitalism, and school shootings are all symptoms of our lack of direction and our tolerance for morons."

Read More: Response Shows School Shooter Was Correct

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Breaking The Glass Of Denial

We support the school shooter Pekka-Eric Auvinen because he shattered the illusion in which most people live. The illusion is that our society is moral, progressive and moving toward a positive goal. The reality is that we are living in delusion, we are doing it for our own selfish sense of status, and that the end result will be to breed ourselves into stupidity, to pollute the planet and kill its beautiful wildlife, and in the meantime, to bore ourselves to death with categorical rules and mirthless function.

In our view, doom awaits us all anyway, so those who are killed now die as symbols of the discontent. This discontent is not widely spread because most people have the attention spans of gnats. However, we have chosen to build our society on the idea of the individual as king over truth, which allows the idiots and parasites among us to run our society into the ground, because if only 1% of people see why something is necessary, and it's not popular or profitable, it gets ignored -- even if it is reality. We commend you to the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche, Arthur Schopenhauer, Theodore Kaczynski, Pentti Linkola, Rene Guenon, Vijay Prozak and Julius Evola for more information.

When people ask why I, personally, support the Jokela shooter my answer is the same as when I am asked why I think the September 11 attacks were awesome. Our world is structured so that we are controlled through our own selfishness, and what our oligarchs want is that we keep distracting ourselves with television, new purchases, fast food, sex, drugs/drink and job titles so that we do not notice the direction in which our species is heading. Essentially, we are cannibalizing ourselves -- a few thoughtless and callous rich will rule over the masses of stupid, and will proclaim themselves Socially Darwinistically fit because of their economic success, all while squeezing out genius, great art, great literature and so on.

I encourage all who read this to look critically at our society. Are we producing better people, or less good people who know how to repeat the neo-Stalinist party line about equality, anti-terrorism, "freedom" and support for special interest groups? Are we producing great art, or did artists find a way to make Britney Spears-level junk art look profound? Are we producing culture, or an endless series of disingenuous hipsters who lack ideas because they're afraid of reality? Are we taking on the moral challenge to grow better like the ancient Greeks and Romans, or are we becoming fat, lazy and incompetent like the remains of third-world dictatorships? Are we using our technology to become better, or are we simply growing more (7 billion) people with barely enough intelligence to watch TV and perform menial jobs, while we consume planet earth?

This is why I support the Jokela shooter: he doesn't let you assume everything is alright. He doesn't let you think that if you just buy the right brand of shoes, things will work out. He doesn't let you believe the lies of politicians, activists, television personalities and religious leaders. He is a giant flaming fist that says IT IS NOT OKAY and that our direction is wrong, the design of our society is wrong, and that we're basically a dying culture of people prejudiced toward negativity, depression and callow materialism -- and that this state will continue until we fix it. It doesn't end until we fix it, and if we let it go on, it destroys all beautiful things and replaces them with a fat, stupid grey race of humans who believe in nothing but eating and defecating. Do you understand now?

Monday, November 05, 2007

History is racist

1) Using the CT data from scanning done in January, a “rapid prototype model” of the skull was made and provided to French forensic anthropologist Jean-Noel Vignal, of the Centre Technique de la Gendarmerie Nationale. Vignal, who works daily with police officials to reconstruct deceased crime victims, determined from the skull that the person had been male, 18 to 20 years old, with Caucasoid features. “Caucasoid” describes a major group of peoples of Europe, North Africa, the Near East and India.

2) From the CT data, Vignal and his team determined basic measurements and features of Tut’s face. For example, the size of the narrow nasal opening, considered a Caucasoid trait, allowed them to fix the size range of Tut’s nose. Other data guided them on the position of the king’s mouth and his receding chin. Vignal also used the data to calculate the correct thickness of skin on Tut’s face.

5) To further validate the French specialists’ work, National Geographic decided to provide the CT data to a second team — but without telling them who they were recreating. Working “blind,” Susan Antón, associate professor of anthropology at New York University, in consultation with Bradley Adams of the chief Medical Examiner’s office, studied the CT data. She quickly described the mystery person as male, age 18 to 19 years, and of African ancestry with several Caucasian affinities, possibly of north African origin — all uncannily accurate. Using this information artist Michael Anderson of the Yale Peabody Museum then created his own likeness of the mystery figure and cast it in plaster.

Science Daily


Curses, he resembles modern North Africans, and not dusky Africans or fair-eyed Nordics. Even more disturbing is that people can recreate races from physical traits, since we all know race is a construct of language and has nothing to do with reality. Only symbols and language are reality. We can deny reality. Except when some asshole like this King Tut (certainly from a Red State) comes in to piss on our parade. History is racist, sexist, IQist, and heightist. Damn history to hell from whence it came.

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Karmic Tar Babies

The old tale, attributed to African-Americans but probably invented by a Mongolian copyriter in New York, describes the tar baby left out as a lure for angry people. A tar baby is symbolic because it looks human and because it won't answer you, it can make you angry. When you then start hitting the thing, all it does is stick to you in increasing degrees, like a trap.

In the lore of ancient religions, a distinction was made between transcendental goals (honor, beauty, glory, balance) and karmic ones, or those things important only to people obsessed with material success and status. Most people are caught up in the karmic whirlwind, and so they agonize over the objects they own, their job status, who wore what at what party, etc. People ensnared in such karmic bullshit constitute parasites and obstructions to those with any higher goal, not in the least because a karmically-minded person "cannot see" the value in a higher goal.

If you ever feel your time is being wasted in this world, it is almost surely because some witless person in the grasp of karmic obsession has created a tar baby for you. You can beat on them, but they refuse to understand (or are too stupid) and so they portray you as the aggressor. They will in fact use this defensive strategy as an offense to get you out of the way, because they fear any goal they don't understand, and while karmic goals are easy to quantify, any transcendental one is a mystery to such nodding empty heads.

When a society is ruled by transcendental people, it may encounter great tragedy through war because in its zeal for struggle, it has been brought to earth by its physical failings. It may go through hard times. However, it will not experience the slow decay brought on by the karmically obsessed, who take a good thing and by their personal fixation on the trivial, slowly erode it to the point where all people are parasitizing each other in their desire to fight fervently for a few meaningless tokens of comfort or self-importance.

Karma brings ego, because without a transcendental goal, we have nothing but ourselves to relapse into, with increasing neurotic fury. When civilizations are ready to die, they become karmic tar babies, where all but a few of their citizens are caught up in a whirlwind of paranoiac obsession with the trivial, and these people will destroy anyone who rises above that state because having any one person not addicted to pointless misery disturbs the karma-minds.

When you see how much people throw their time into jobs which achieve nothing important of substance, but shuffle paper around fervently, and into jockeying for social status which will be forgotten in years not decades, and actually devote large chunks of their free time into thinking about what objects they must buy (without a clear need for such objects, like a fetish), you know the end isn't far away. We live in such a transparent plastic time and as the tar smears across us, only a few are poking up heads to point out that our karmic addictions are not real, at least not as real as the intangible but vital transcendental experience that might lift us from such a dung-browed treacle.